|
|
Art
School Gallery
Hey -- you made it to this page! Few will, as most don't look
at the "about me" pages. So, as you've ventured this
far, you deserve to be inflicted with even more information on
me. Actually, I appreciate your curiosity and taking the time
to travel this deep into my web site.
I had been taking
classes in realistic and impressionist drawing and painting at
the Minnesota River
School of Fine Art until I could no longer afford classes.
It was a wonderful experience, and one I hope to return to once
I make my fortune as a professional photographer. Yeah, right
... don't hold your breath, Pat (Pat is the director and head
instructor at the school). I learned quite a bit in my couple
years of classes, and of course I have a long ways to go. But
art is a learning experience; I don't believe an artist ever stops
learning or encountering new and unique challenges in their craft.
These are samples of my student work, and a couple pieces I did
at home outside of class. I hope to one day paint in the style
of the English Victorian painters; the Pre-Raphaelites are a huge
influence in what I'd like to do.
Other influences are the instructors at the Minnesota River School.
I firmly believe that any success I achieved at the school are
a direct measure of the quality of instruction there. I took most
of my classes from Pat Jerde, the director and head instructor,
and I've been amazed at her abilities to teach and inspire her
students. The critiques I received while at the school were indispensable
in learning, and while never letting me get away with anything
the were given in a very positive way. I really hated it when
I was instructed to bring Keith's nose down about 1/4 inch, and
it was truly annoying because I knew Karen was right. But it wasn't
as hard as I had thought it would be -- fixing a painting is one
of the best ways to learn.
Photographing this stuff was an experiment with a new toy of
mine -- a Nikon Coolpix 5000 digital camera. Its a nice little
thing, as I can use studio lights with it (which is why I bought
it). Not all the pictures are that great -- some are behind glass
and a couple are varnished. So, because of glare I had to shoot
them at weird angles. You can still see the work fairly well,
but I'd prefer it to be shot more front-on. I may update them
with better photos at some point in the future.
|
| |
This is a rather old drawing;
it was drawn and brushed in charcoal on charcoal paper. |
| |
This
is my very first cast drawing; it was done in charcoal on velum
paper. It took around ten three-hour class sessions, and was a very
intense experience. Its surprising how tired you can get simply
drawing, but when you're "in the zone" you burn a lot
of energy. And cast drawings take a lot of concentration and can
be very frustrating. But its amazing how much you learn (at the
expense of pulling out half your hair). |
| |
This drawing is in charcoal, and is on charcoal paper. It took a
very long time to complete, mostly because it sat on my table easel
for weeks. It probably didn't take all that long to do in reality,
but I never worked on it for long periods of time in single sittings.
|
| |
This portrait doesn't look all that interesting or great, but it
was my first success. This was done in a class titled "quick
portrait" taught by Pat Jerde. Typically to paint a portrait
you need around ten three hour sessions, or more. This was done
in only four sittings and it was (I believe) my second attempt to
paint a portrait. My first attempt will never be seen by any living
being (trust me -- it truly sucked). Another good point on this
one is I did most of the work myself. Previously, my instructor
would draw or paint on the piece to demonstrate a technique, but
this one is mostly me. The good eye was painted by Pat, and she
didn't even charge me for it! Woo hoo! I have an original Jerde...
and I got it for free! |
| |
This portrait of Keith is an example of the more traditional twelve
week sitting. I probably only worked on it for ten or less sessions,
but it has a much more finished look than the previous piece. This
was my third attempt to paint a portrait at the school, so I'm rather
happy with the results. This class was also taught by Pat Jerde. |
| |
Okay, here's the bane of my existence -- the stupid ear. I titled
it "portrait of Van Gogh" as a joke. I think its really
called "The Stupid Ear." I had intended to paint a still
life, but it was suggested I start with something simple. So, I
grabbed an ear cast off the wall and started to work with it. I
figured four sessions tops, then I could paint my kick-ass still
life. Well, it didn't quite go that way. The stupid thing took ten
weeks, upon which I declared it done and retired to the bar and
drank a gallon of Guinness. Okay, I made up that last part. But
I sure felt like it! Having said all that, the experience of painting
this stupid thing taught me a ton about painting. All of this is
directly applicable to other projects; the work is never wasted.
But still... stupid ear! |
| |
Here's the last portrait I painted at the school. I think this represents
around eight weeks of painting, and it isn't quite finished (but
hey -- its close enough). I like the background, and for some reason
the skin tones aren't coming out yellow any more. Hmmm... I must
be learning something. |
| |
This is just an example of how a painting may start, if I were to
ever complete one. This has been sitting against my wall for months,
and there's one that's been sitting on my easel for almost as long.
This is simply the under painting, over which the colors are painted.
This one was painted from one of my photographs, and when complete
won't differ much from the photo. |
Home
:: Wildlife
Galleries :: People Galleries :: Purchasing
Photos :: My Rates :: Purchasing
via PayPal© :: About the Photos :: Shows
:: What's New? ::
Guest Book
:: What's an Axolotyl? :: Info
About Me
Send E-Mail
11/16/04 3:29 AM
|
|